ارتقای فرصت حضور و مشارکت مردم با استفاده از معرفی گونه های فضای عمومی شهر خلاق (نمونه موردی شهر یزد)

Promoting Public Participation Through Public Spaces of The Creative City (Case Study: City of Yazd)

گزارش خطا
نویسنده : کیومرث ایراندوست، مصطفی غلامی زارچی
نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
زبان : فارسی
دوره : 20
شماره : 2
زمان انتشار : تابستان 1394

امروزه مشارکت شهروندان، نیاز اساسی برای دستیابی به شهر خوب و پایدار است. افزایش علاقه­ مندی برای حضور در فضای عمومی و افزایش برهم­ کنش اجتماعی و بروز خلاقیت شهروندان برای مشارکت گروه­ های اجتماعی می‌تواند بسیار مفید باشد. این مقاله، با روشی توصیفی و تحلیلی و با رویکردی کمی و کیفی، ضمن بررسی ابعاد مختلف فضای عمومی در شهر یزد، گونه­های فضای عمومی باقابلیت­ و عملکرد جدید بر پایه شاخصه­های شهر خلاق، زمینه ارتقای حضور شهروندان را معرفی و ارزیابی نموده­است؛ در این راستا بر مبنای روش مقایسه­ ای، شاخصه­ ها و معیارهای مبنا برای تشخیص وضعیت فضای عمومی خلاق یزد ارائه‌شده است. تحلیل اختلافی- ارزشی و یکنواخت معیارهای به‌دست‌آمده از جمله سلسله‌مراتب فضای عمومی، فضای چندمنظوره و مستعد و پاسخگوی نیاز مردم، فعالیت و مشاغل نزدیک به هم، فضای مهیج و فرهنگ مشارکت نشان می­دهد که شهر یزد را می­توان به‌عنوان شهری با پتانسیل شهر خلاق برای معرفی گونه­ های جدید فضای عمومی در نظر گرفت. این بررسی نشان می‌دهد که کارکرد فضاهای عمومی، ارتباطی، شکل‌دهنده محله، مسکونی، چندمنظوره، شکوفا کننده استعداد مردم، تقویت­ کننده روابط اجتماعی، مهیج، پاسخگو، آگاهی­دهنده و اعتقادی بوده است. این فضاها می­تواند انگیزه حضور مردم برای افزایش مشارکت عمومی در مدیریت شهر را فراهم کند.


Citizen participation in various aspects of urban affairs is a key component of urban management to create sustainable city. Public space has a great role in increasing social interaction, reflecting citizens’ creativity, promoting sense of interest, and creating sense of participation among different social groups. Creative city is concept that provides a new way for city application of creative factors to generate opportunities for urban prosperity. This approach can be a tool for tourism growth through public space development and Emphasizing the importance of culture as an urban development factor. In this process, the important point is to increase the attractiveness and competitiveness of public space for cultural events and more use of public spaces. The key point is promoting constructive interaction among people in public spaces by cultural events. The purpose of this paper is to promote the opportunity of citizen’s participation through introducing new forms of public space which is in line with characteristics of creative city. The characteristics and criteria of creative city were conceptualized based on the literature review and experiences. This formed a structure to detect the status of public space in the city of Yazd regarding the concept of creative city. Yazd is ancient city with dual texture (old and new) that its public spaces was not consider by cities authority. Although its Physical quality is deteriorating, its spatial structure consider hierarchical pattern in the line with good city form theory. The urban development plans pay more attention to the new development area and ignore the old neighborhoods. While public spaces in the old part of the city contained the potential to promote participation. But they were given less attention by cities authorities and urban development. The study shows that the public spaces contain hierarchical in the old town. On the contrary, there is no hierarchical in the new development area and they only contained semipublic and public space zone. This study shows that can be used to increase participation in city spaces, but they require some physical changes and reorganization. New and old Public spaces such as midancheh in center of old neighborhood, bazaar and, other tradition trade spaces, Public spaces of Offices, educational spaces, Mosques and other Religious and historical space, Streets, alleys and dead ends, Leisure spaces, terminals, and nods. Yazd public space planning can be divided in several categories: Multi-purpose public spaces like bus station, open space of old neighborhoods, new open spaces, streets and shopping centers. In the meantime, most of this spaces especially urban exciting spaces are meanly neglected. The creative city emphasis on the public spaces in line white participatory approach and its capability to adapt white interest of the creative class and the people. The difference-value analysis and resulting uniform standards, including the hierarchy of public spaces, multifunctional and responsive spaces, activities close to each other, exciting atmosphere, and corporate culture show that the city of Yazd contained the potential of a creative city in Iran. Each of these points can motivate the presence and participation of people in the decision-making, implementation and management of the city.

(708.7 کیلوبایت) دانلود مقاله  

مشخصات مقاله

مراجع :

ابراهیمی، مهران (1387)، نشست شهر خلاق؛ مفاهیم، سیاست­ها، مطالعه موردی از شهرهای موفق و ناموفق، مرکز مطالعات و برنامه­ریزی شهری شهر تهران، فرهنگسرای نیاوران، تهران.


رفیعیان، مجتبی و حسینی­پور، علی (1391)، نظریه، شهر، فضا، مدیریت شهری، چاپ اول، انتشارات طحان، تهران.


سعیدی، هادی (1389)، شهر خلاق، مجله شهرداری­ها، شماره 100، صص 5-11.


شبانی، امیرحسین و ایزدی، محمد سعید (1393)، رویکردی نوین به بازآفرینی شهر خلاق،نقش جهان، سال چهارم، شماره دوم، صص63-73.


مارکوس، پیتر و دیگران (1392)، در جستجوی شهر عدالت­محور، مترجم: هادی سعید رضوانی و محبوبه کشمیری، نشر شهر، تهران.




Ashtari, H & Mahdneghad, H (2011), Creative city, Creative class, Tisa Pub, Tehran.

Carmona, Mathew; Claudio, de Magadha’s; Leo, Hammond )2003(, Public Space The management dimension, Routledge.220

Cattell, V; Dinesb, N; Geslerc, W, and Curtisd, S (2008), Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations, Health & Place, 14, 544-561

DCMS (1998), the Creative industries mapping document, London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport, 32

Florida, R. L (2002), the rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, NY: Basic Books,New York.

Gulick, J (1998), The “disappearance” of public space: an ecological Marxist and Lefebvrian approach in A. Light and J. Smith (eds) The Production of Public Space, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield.141-135.

Montgomery, John (2005), Dublin, Sheffield, Manchester and Adelaide: Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration, In Charlesworth, Esther Ruth. Cityedge: Case Studies in Contemporary Urbanism, Routledge, Oxford, 34.

Navarro Yáñez, Clemente (2013), Do ‘creative cities’ have a dark side? Cultural scenes and socioeconomic status in Barcelona and Madrid (1991–2001), Cities, 35, p 213.

Okano, H; Samson, D ) 2010(, Cultural urban branding and creative cities: A theoretical framework for promoting creativity in the public spaces, Cities, 27, pp10-15.

REIS, A.C & KAGEYAMA, P (Org.)(2009), Creative City Perspectives,1st Edition, Garimpo de Soluções, São Paulo, 12-20.

Shaftoe, henry(2008), Convivial Urban Spaces Creating Effective Public Places, Earth scan in the UK and USA, London, Sterling, VA,15.

Shamsuddin, Shuhana; Norsidah, Ujang (2008), Making Places: The Role of Attachment in Creating the Sense of Place for Traditional Streets in Malaysia, Habitat International, 32, pp 399–400.

Young, Anne F; Anne Russell and Jennifer R. Powers (2004), The Sense of Belonging to a Neighborhood: Can it be measured and is It Related to Health and Well-being in Older Women?, Social Science and Medicine, 59, pp 26–28.


مسابقات

جوایز

نشریات

منابع اینترنتی :

https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir