بنای رُشت‌خوار؛ مسجد یا خانقاه؟

Roshtkhār Monument: a Mosque or a Khaneqah?

گزارش خطا
نویسنده : مهرداد قیومی بیدهندی، سینا سلطانی
نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
زبان : فارسی
دوره : 7
شماره : 13
زمان انتشار : پاییز، زمستان 1393

بسیاری از بناهای ایران در طی روزگاران به سبب‌های گوناگون از میان رفته یا «نوع» آنها منقرض شده است. خانقاه یکی از این انواع است. از راه‌های شناخت معماری خانقاه بررسی بناهایی است که بر سر نوع آنها اختلاف است. بنای معروف به «مسجد جامع رشت‌خوار» در راه زاوه به خواف در زمرۀ این بنا‌هاست. تحقیق‌هایی که دربارۀ این بنا انجام گرفته متکی بر اصول معماری خانقاه و کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی نبوده است. این مقاله متکی به یافته‌هایی تازه دربارۀ معماری خانقاه در خراسان سدۀ پنجم و نیز برخی یافته‌های باستان‌شناختی است. بنای رشت‌خوار که در بیرون شهر رشت‌خوار کنونی واقع شده، درون شهر قدیم رشت‌خوار یا در کرانۀ غربی آن بوده است. کالبد بنا مرکب است از دستگاه ورودی، صحن با حجر‌ه‌هایی گرداگرد آن و یک ایوان و یک گنبد‌خانه. بنای رشت‌خوار در حدود سدۀ پنجم ساخته شده است و در دورۀ تیموریان آن را تعمیر کرده‌اند و کتیبه‌ای به بنا افزوده‌اند. بنای رشت‌خوار پیش از ثبت در فهرست آثار ملی خانقاه خوانده می‌شد؛ اما همواره بر سر نوع آن میان محققان اختلاف بوده است. هیچ‌یک از محققان معیارشان را برای خانقاه خواندن یا نخواندن بنای رشت‌خوار مشخص نکرده‌اند. بر اساس تحقیق یاد شده دربارۀ معماری خانقاه، بنای رشت‌خوار با معماری خانقاه و سلسله‌مراتب کالبدی و کارکردی آن انطباق دارد. این انطباق نشان می‌دهد که به ظن قوی بنای رشت‌خوار خانقاه است.


Many of Iranian architectural works have been demolished over time. Moreover, there are some “types” of buildings that were almost completely demolished and became extinct. Khaneqah is one of these types. As stated in historic Persian and Arabic texts, before Safavid era there have many khaneqahs in Iranian cities and towns, even there have been many cities with more than one khaneqah. Safavids, who originated from the Safavid Sufi Order destroyed, deformed or at least renamed most of khaneqahs that belonged to non-Safavid or non-Shiite Sufi orders. Founding a khaneqah, which was known as an important pious and religious practice gradually declined and from tenth century AH/ sixteenth century AD onwards, khaneqah’s architecture almost faded away. Nowadays, Iranians and Iranian architectural historians have no clear image or idea about khaneqah’s formation, configuration, and architectural characteristics. Therefore they are unable to distinguish ruins of a building that someday might have been a khaneqah. Identifying the characteristics of khaneqah can be carried out using several sources, including historic texts, Islamic literature, studying the buildings that are known as khaneqah, and finally, studying the buildings that are known as hosseyniyyeh, mosque, mausoleum, or madrasa, but to the scholars their types are under debate. Roshtkhār monument is a prominent example of such buildings. On the Zaveh-Khāf road in Khorasan, there are some ruins of a building known as Roshtkhār Friday Mosque. This paper will examine the architecture of the monument on the basis of archeological findings and also recent findings about khaneqah architectural characteristics in Persian literature in early Islamic centuries. The ruins of Roshtkhār building are located in the suburb of the new Roshtkhār town; however recent archaeological excavations show that the building was someday located inside the town or on its west side. The building consists of a portal, a court with some rooms around it, an Iwan, and a domed hall. The Iwan has the domed hall on one side and the ruins of an unknown space (probably a second domed hall) on the other side. Date of the building is under debate; but on the basis of archaeological findings and comparing the scholars’ dating, we will show that the construction of the building dates back to eleventh century AD, with an important restoration including a dated thuluth inscription in fifteenth century AD. The building used to be called as khaneqah before it was registered in the Iran’s National Registry of Architectural Heritage in 1976; however, its type has been under debate. None of the scholars have clarified their criteria used to identify the type of this building. Therefore, we should take another way to identify its type: deliberating the building compatibility with khaneqahs’ physical configuration and functional requirements. In this paper we examine the type of this building on the basis of the criteria that we achieved in another research about khaneqah architecture and will show that the building almost completely corresponds to khaneqah architectural characteristics. So it is a khaneqah rather than a Friday mosque.

(1.0 مگابایت) دانلود مقاله  

مسابقات

جوایز

نشریات

منابع اینترنتی :

http://aup.journal.art.ac.ir